To the Editor,

How often do Senators Jack Reed and Sheldon Whitehouse ride to work on a RIPTA bus? I think we all know the answer to that, but I wish, just the same, that columnists Ryan Doherty and Anisha Kunar had posed the question to each of the two career politicians.

The senators, along with Congressman Gabe Amo, and a “star-studded cast of speakers” were present to celebrate the shoveling of $7.6 million down the rabbit hole of electric vehicle and “green economy” ridiculousness. (RIPTA plugs in RI’s first in-line electric charge”, July 4)

As reported, Senator Reed claimed that the new station “will lower pollution and save dollars.” But can he prove that will happen?

Where does he think the electricity needed to charge these buses will come from? In Rhode Island, most of our electricity is generated by burning natural gas. The electric charging station the senator is touting will be powered by fossil fuels. How can that lower pollution? Senator Reed doesn’t say.

As far as saving dollars goes, my understanding is that electric buses cost far more to produce than internal combustion buses. And the cost for replacing their batteries, which have a limited life expectancy, is exorbitant. How will that save money, Senator?

Senator Reed says he wants to usher in “an electric-focused future”. Very well then, I challenge our climate conscious senator to forswear commuting between Rhode Island and Washington, D.C. in those awful carbon spewing, air polluting, and gas guzzling jet planes.

He could pledge to make all future commutes exclusively in electric powered vehicles. In so doing, he would demonstrate his commitment to “an entirely electric transit system”.

Yes, in this instance, Senator Jack Reed could lead by example. He could be a guide and inspiration to us all.

What do you say, Senator Reed? Will you accept the challenge?

A. H. Liddle, of Warwick